HopSkipDrive Logo

CRM Modernization Strategy Supporting Future Technological and Organizational Growth

multiple shapes

Client

Top Destination Management and Marketing Organization

Engagement Length

Multi-phase engagement over ten months

Scope

Enterprise CRM qualitative assessment, RFP development, and vendor evaluation support for a destination marketing and management organization (DMMO)

Opportunity

The client was approaching a critical decision point regarding its long-standing CRM platform. The organization had evolved significantly since the inception of the platform, expanding its audiences, programs, and strategic initiatives.

Leadership recognized that before initiating a time-intensive RFP process, they needed a clear, unbiased understanding of

  • How the CRM was actually being used across departments
  • Where the system enabled or hindered daily work
  • Whether existing limitations were rooted in technology, data practices, or adoption
  • And whether the platform could realistically support the organization’s needs three to five years into the future

Noetic Sales Enablement was engaged to lead a structured qualitative assessment to inform a data-driven decision: optimize the current platform or move forward with a full CRM RFP and vendor evaluation.

Approach

Noetic partnered closely with executive leadership to design and execute a rigorous, phased approach that balanced objectivity, organizational context, and long-term strategic impact.

triangles for opening quotation
Katie brought structure, objectivity, and clarity to a complex decision that impacts every part of our organization. The qualitative assessment gave us a shared language to discuss what was working, what wasn’t, and what we truly needed from a CRM moving forward.
triangles for closing quotation
Director of Information Technology

Key Strategies Included

Enabling Seller Adoption at Scale

To ensure adoption across a large sales organization, Noetic applied a seller-first enablement lens:

  • Simplified slide flow and narrative progression
  • Embedded guidance on how and when to use key sections
  • Aligned messaging to how sellers actually engage clients in the field

This focus on usability ensured the pitch deck would be consistently used and leveraged as a complimentary tool to sales conversations.

Designing for Real Sales Conversations

The pitch deck was intentionally built to support live, consultative selling:

  • Modular sections that sellers can navigate based on client needs
  • Logical flow aligned to discovery and solutioning conversations
  • Reduced slide density to prevent over-presenting

This structure allows the same deck to be used across prospecting, discovery, and proposal discussions—improving consistency while increasing flexibility.

Clarifying the Value Proposition

Complex financial products were reorganized into a clear, outcome-oriented value framework. This approach:

  • Connects each solution to a specific client pain point
  • Differentiates the institution beyond feature parity
  • Reinforces credibility through tangible business impact

The result is a value story that helps sellers confidently articulate why the solution matters, not just how it works.

Reframing the Story Around the Buyer

The redesigned deck leads with the client’s reality, not the institution’s offerings. Early sections focus on:

  • Market and regulatory pressures impacting financial decision-makers
  • Operational and financial risks of maintaining the status quo
  • Business outcomes clients are trying to achieve

By anchoring the narrative in buyer context and urgency, sellers are able to engage clients earlier and position solutions more naturally.

Vendor Evaluation & Decision Support

Noetic supported the full vendor evaluation process, including:

  • Response analysis and qualitative scoring
  • Comparative assessments across strategic alignment, cost, implementation complexity, adoption risk, and data capability
  • Executive-level summaries and risk-weighted recommendations to support leadership decision-making

RFP Development

Once the decision was made to proceed with a CRM RFP,Noetic translated qualitative findings directly into functional and strategic requirements.

The RFP was designed to:

  • Reflect real operational needs across departments
  • Address data architecture, integrations, reporting, and governance
  • Evaluate vendor ability to support future growth, AI readiness, and cross-department visibility
  • Balance implementation risk, cost of ownership, and user adoption

Executive Findings & Recommendation Framework

Rather than producing a binary “replace vs. stay”answer, Noetic delivered a nuanced evaluation outlining

  • Where the current CRM was delivering strong value
  • Where organizational process and data practices were limiting ROI
  • Where technology constraints posed long-term risk to scalability and innovation

This enabled leadership to make an informed decision grounded in evidence, not anecdote.

Qualitative CRM Assessment

Noetic conducted in-depth interviews with cross-functional teams spanning sales, services, partnerships, digital strategy, destination development, integrated brand, public relations, research, and executive leadership.

The assessment focused on

  • Day-to-day CRM usage and workarounds
  • Data quality, reporting reliability, and integration gaps
  • User adoption, training, and governance practices
  • Cross-department visibility and relationship management
  • Readiness for future capabilities, including analytics and AI

All feedback was coded, analyzed, and synthesized into a structured qualitative read-out to separate perception from root cause and highlighting systemic versus team-specific opportunities for improvement.

Customer-Backwards Enablement

Framed all enablement content and sessions from the client’s perspective—helping sales teams tell a cohesive, value-driven story that connected directly to buyer needs.

Cross-Functional Engagement

Integrated speakers from product, legal, and operations into kickoff and onboarding sessions to strengthen alignment, trust, and shared ownership.

Centralized Information Architecture

Consolidated product launch materials and sales resources into a single, intuitive enablement hub.

Bauhaus style triangles and square

Impact

The engagement delivered clarity, alignment, and confidence at a pivotal moment for the organization
01

Leadership gained an unbiased, cross-functional view of CRM performance and limitations

02

The organization avoided premature platform decisions by separating technology gaps from adoption and process issues

03

CRM requirements were grounded in real user needs rather than theoretical feature lists

04

The RFP and evaluation process was streamlined, defensible, and executive-ready

05

Stakeholders across departments felt heard, increasing trust and change readiness

06

Most importantly, the client was positioned to make a long-term CRM decision aligned to its evolving mission, data strategy, and growth objectives.

Up Next